Instagram and Facebook stole hundreds of songs, lawsuit claims – Billboard

Meta Platforms Inc. is facing a lawsuit that claims its Facebook and Instagram platforms “intentionally and brazenly” stole hundreds of songs from Swedish production music label Epidemic Sound, encouraging their users to upload more than 50,000 videos counterfeited every day.

Pushed back by lawyers at music law firm Pryor Cashman, Epidemic claims the social media giant offers nearly 1,000 of the label’s songs via its “music library” which users can add to their video uploads, but that Meta refused to obtain copyright licenses. for this music – and ignored the company’s repeated requests that she do so.

“Perhaps Meta is hoping to get away with it as long as possible,” Epidemic’s attorneys wrote in a lawsuit filed Wednesday, July 20, in federal court in San Francisco. “Perhaps Meta is hoping this will intimidate a company like Epidemic into bowing to Meta rather than incur the disruption and expense of a lawsuit. Meta is wrong.

Epidemic says it will seek at least $142 million in damages, since it is entitled to $150,000 in damages for each song violated. A spokesperson for Meta did not immediately return a request for comment on Friday.

Platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, and Snapchat typically secure extensive licenses with major music companies, allowing their users to choose from a solid roster of fully licensed music without the risk of copyright infringement.

But Epidemic, which offers a catalog of so-called production music for use in videos, podcasts and other content, says Meta simply never sought such a license for its tracks before incorporating them into the library. The result, he says, was a full-scale breach.

“Thanks to Meta’s actions, Epidemic’s music is available on millions of videos and has been viewed billions of times,” the company wrote. “About 50,000 counterfeit videos and 30,000 new uploads containing Epidemic’s music are uploaded to Facebook and Instagram, respectively, daily.”

Under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, platforms like YouTube are protected from direct legal liability when a user uploads content containing infringing music, as long as the site takes prompt action to remove the video when alerted. But Epidemic says those rules don’t apply, since Meta provides the music directly to its users.

“These infringing uses are not simply users posting infringing works that Meta has failed to remove,” Epidemic’s attorneys wrote. “This case involves Meta itself actively and directly infringing Epidemic works by storing them in its online music library and then making a curated selection of Epidemic works available on its platforms.”

Epidemic says it has reached out on more than a dozen occasions to alert Meta to the problem, but has been rebuffed. He also says he was denied access to anti-piracy tools provided to other rights holders.

Source link

About Eileen W. Sudduth

Check Also

Cam’ron & A-Trak, a-ha, Carly Rae Jepsen, Sparta, more

So many artists, so many songs, so little time. Every week, we review a handful …